Dear visitor, welcome to Legend: Legacy of the Dragons Forum.
If this is your first visit here, please read the Help. It explains in detail how this page works.
To use all features of this page, you should consider registering.
Please use the registration form, to register here or read more information about the registration process.
If you are already registered, please login here.
About me
-
Title: What Professors Think About the Rise of Online Class Help Services
Introduction
The educational landscape has Hire Online Class Help been rapidly evolving with the integration of technology, remote learning, and online class platforms. Amid these transformations, a parallel industry has emerged—online class help services. These services, offering anything from tutoring and editing to full-scale course completion, have sparked a wave of controversy and curiosity, especially among educators. Professors, who are central figures in maintaining academic standards and integrity, hold a range of opinions about the increasing use of paid academic help services by students.
This article delves into how professors view the rise of online class help, examining the ethical concerns, perceived impacts on learning, their reactions to evolving student behavior, and what the future may look like in classrooms increasingly touched by academic outsourcing.
Understanding the Context: What Are Online Class Help Services?
Online class help services offer support for students enrolled in digital or hybrid learning environments. These services range from:
- Tutoring and subject-specific coaching
- Homework and assignment help
- Essay writing and editing
- Quiz and exam assistance
- Full course management (in more unethical forms)
While these services may provide academic support, many also blur the line between tutoring and academic dishonesty, especially when they involve impersonation or direct submission of someone else’s work.
Professors' Concerns: The Ethical Dilemma
The most immediate and pressing concern for professors is academic integrity. Many view class help services—particularly those that complete work on a student’s behalf—as a direct violation of institutional honor codes. This concern is multi-layered:
- Misrepresentation: When students pass off outsourced work as their own, they misrepresent their understanding and effort.
- Unfair advantage: Students using paid help may receive higher grades without doing the required intellectual labor.
- Erosion of trust: Professors feel betrayed when students submit ghostwritten work, leading to increased skepticism and stricter grading.
Many professors argue that such Online Class Helper practices not only undermine the value of degrees but also devalue the effort of students who maintain academic integrity.
The Complexity of Compassion: Understanding Why Students Use These Services
While ethics remain central to professors' objections, some are willing to explore why students feel the need to outsource their academic responsibilities. In interviews, surveys, and professional forums, a growing number of educators acknowledge that the motivations behind using these services are complex, not always malicious.
Common reasons include:
- Overwhelming workloads
- Part-time or full-time jobs
- Family obligations, especially for single parents
- Learning disabilities or mental health struggles
- Lack of sufficient institutional support
Some professors argue that while the method (outsourcing) is flawed, the motivation is a signal of systemic failure. In this view, the rise of these services isn’t just a student issue—it reflects the pressure cooker environment of modern higher education.
Impact on Student Learning: Lost Opportunities for Growth
Professors widely believe that relying on class help services hinders genuine learning. Academic assignments are not arbitrary tasks—they are designed to build critical skills such as:
- Research and analytical thinking
- Academic writing and argumentation
- Time management and personal responsibility
- Discipline-specific knowledge
When students bypass these nurs fpx 4065 assessment 1 challenges by outsourcing, they miss out on developmental milestones critical for personal and professional success.
Additionally, professors worry that students who rely heavily on external help enter the workforce unprepared, having never truly engaged with their field of study.
Detection Challenges and Institutional Response
Many professors express frustration over the difficulty in detecting third-party involvement, especially in online environments where face-to-face interaction is limited. Tools like plagiarism checkers (e.g., Turnitin) may not flag assignments written by humans who aren't the student, making contract cheating hard to prove.
As a result, institutions have started implementing:
- Oral assessments or video presentations to confirm student understanding
- AI-authorship detection tools
- Randomized quiz questions or timed assignments
- Honor pledges and academic integrity contracts
While helpful, these measures often increase administrative burdens for professors already dealing with large class sizes and digital fatigue.
Mixed Reactions: From Outrage to Adaptation
Professors’ responses to class help services fall along a spectrum. Here are a few perspectives gathered from academic forums, research studies, and interviews:
- The Traditionalist (Strictly Against)
This group views any external academic assistance, even tutoring, as a threat to academic purity. They advocate for strict penalties, including failure and expulsion for students caught using such services.
- The Realist (Understanding but Firm)
These professors recognize the pressures students face but insist on maintaining clear ethical boundaries. They often provide enhanced support options like office hours, extended deadlines, or peer mentoring to reduce the need for external help.
- The Innovator (Willing to Adapt)
A growing number of educators see nurs fpx 4065 assessment 4 the rise of these services as a wake-up call to reform pedagogy. They suggest redesigning assignments to make cheating less attractive and learning more engaging.
Examples include:
- Personalized, open-ended projects
- Interactive discussions instead of essays
- Group-based collaborative tasks with oral defenses
This approach emphasizes engagement over memorization, making outsourcing less useful.
Faculty Surveys: What the Data Says
Surveys conducted in recent years provide quantitative insights into how professors view academic outsourcing. Key findings include:
- 70% of faculty believe that the use of online class help is increasing.
- 82% think it compromises learning outcomes.
- 63% report being unsure whether a student’s submission was truly their own.
- Only 34% believe their institution provides adequate tools to detect contract cheating.
- 55% are in favor of revising course designs to make cheating less viable.
These numbers reflect a broad concern but also a willingness among many professors to evolve in response to new academic realities.
Case Study: Professors Responding Creatively
At a midwestern U.S. university, a sociology professor noticed a spike in high-performing essays from previously average students. Suspecting third-party involvement but lacking proof, she took a different route.
Instead of punitive action, she redesigned her assignments to include:
- Recorded oral summaries
- Peer reviews in breakout rooms
- In-class timed reflections based on submitted essays
Not only did this reduce suspected cheating, but it also increased student engagement and allowed the professor to assess comprehension more accurately.
Other professors are experimenting with portfolio-based assessments or frequent, low-stakes quizzes that make large, cheat-prone assignments less central to course grades.
Student-Professor Dynamics: A Trust Issue
The rise of class help services has strained the trust dynamic between students and professors. Instructors want to support students, but suspicion makes genuine connection difficult.
Students, on the other hand, may hesitate to ask for help—fearing judgment or lack of empathy—pushing them toward external services. This cycle damages academic culture, where support should ideally come from within the institution.
Professors are calling for more transparent communication and for universities to:
- Provide safe spaces for students to discuss workload concerns
- Increase mental health and tutoring resources
- Make office hours more accessible and approachable
- Rethink grading systems that emphasize outcomes over learning
The Role of Technology and AI: Complicating the Landscape
With AI-powered tools like ChatGPT, Grammarly, and AI essay generators, professors now face a new challenge: distinguishing between AI-enhanced writing and fully human-authored work. Many professors feel caught between:
- Wanting to encourage tech literacy and responsible use
- Needing to maintain clear academic boundaries
Some advocate for AI usage policies similar to citation rules, where students disclose when and how they’ve used AI in their work.
Others express concern that AI is becoming the new ghostwriter, more difficult to detect and easier to access than traditional contract cheating.
Toward Solutions: What Professors Recommend
Professors understand that students seek help for a reason—and are offering several solutions to address the root causes of academic outsourcing:
- Build Relationships Early: Personalized feedback, interactive check-ins, and rapport-building can reduce the temptation to cheat.
- Transparent Expectations: Clear rubrics and examples reduce ambiguity and make students feel more confident about their ability to succeed on their own.
- Flexible Learning Models: Offering multiple ways to demonstrate understanding (papers, presentations, podcasts) empowers students with diverse strengths.
- Normalize Help-Seeking: Encouraging students to use institutional resources rather than third-party services builds healthier academic habits.
Conclusion: A Call for Collaboration, Not Conflict
The rise of online class help nurs fpx 4905 assessment 2 services has undeniably disrupted traditional academic models. For professors, the challenge lies in balancing integrity with empathy, and enforcement with adaptation. While many decry the misuse of these services as academic fraud, others view them as signals that students are overwhelmed, underserved, or disconnected.
The conversation should not be framed purely around punishment but around understanding and reform. When professors, students, and institutions work together to foster authentic learning, flexible pedagogy, and open communication, the reliance on external help diminishes naturally.
In the end, the professor's role isn’t just to evaluate—but to guide, inspire, and support. In a world where academic help is a click away, making learning personal, meaningful, and inclusive may be the strongest deterrent to outsourcing that educators have.
Charlotte Rose
"Charlotte Rose" is female
